LT HorizonLearning Technology HorizonFree newsletter
Capability intelligence

How is SAP Certification changing in 2026?

SAP describes a certification direction centred on practical performance in live systems, including permitted use of AI tools. That changes the kind of capability an assessment seeks to observe, while individual credentials may still be at different stages of transition.

Evidence CDecision horizon NowUpdated 09 Oct 2026
Editorial illustration: Editorial context for How is SAP Certification changing in 2026?
Editorial context for How is SAP Certification changing in 2026?
LT Horizon generated editorial illustration · not evidence
Image provenanceLT Horizon Visual Editor v2 · GPT-Image-2 generated editorial illustration; never evidence.

What a practical assessment is intended to observe

SAP's September 2026 programme update discusses realistic tasks in live SAP systems. The emphasis moves towards carrying out work, rather than demonstrating product knowledge only through recalled answers.

A practical task can expose how someone interprets a requirement, selects a configuration approach and responds when the result is unexpected. This is an explanation of the assessment direction, not a claim that every certification tests the same scenario or follows one universal format.

AI use changes the task, not the responsibility

SAP says AI tools can be used during assessments by design. Access to assistance does not make an answer reliable by itself: the person still needs to understand the system, assess the suggestion and produce the required result.

That distinction connects certification with the work consultants actually perform. Knowing where to obtain information and recognising when it does not fit the task are different from memorising terminology. The programme direction makes practical execution and judgement more prominent in preparation.

The credential-specific boundary

The source describes a programme change, not a simultaneous conversion of every current credential to an identical assessment. Route, access and transition timing therefore remain part of the specific certification being considered.

The preparation advice below follows the practical direction while retaining that limit. It is intended to help a learner prepare for the capability being tested; the official current route for the target credential remains the authority for its actual format and permitted tools.

This explanation draws on SAP Certification Marks 30 Years of Validating Skills for an Evolving World of Work. The evidence limits and publication history remain below.

How to read this briefCheck the sources to see what is documented. Our recommendation explains what that means for your decision. Proof patterns add specific design or implementation examples and explain their limits.
LT Horizon DECISION BRIEF
Answer

SAP describes a move towards practical assessments in live systems, including permitted use of AI tools. Add configuration, troubleshooting and explanations of design choices to your preparation. Check the current format for the specific certification you plan to take.

Who should care

SAP learners, consultants, managers planning development pathways and organisations using certification as one input to capability decisions.

Recommended action

ACT — add hands-on system scenarios and AI-assisted problem solving to certification preparation, while checking the current official assessment format for the target credential.

LT Horizon interpretation · Evidence confidence C

What changed

SAP’s 11 September 2026 update describes performance-based assessment and permitted AI-assisted working.

Why it matters

A credential that tests practical task execution changes what good preparation looks like. Memorising terminology becomes less useful than being able to configure, troubleshoot, interpret evidence and explain why a solution is appropriate.

Implementation implications

Prerequisites

Confirm the current certification route and assessment format for the specific credential, then ensure access to sufficient hands-on system practice.

Architecture implications

No product architecture change. The implication is for capability development: certification evidence should be complemented by implementation experience and judgement.

Risks

Do not assume every current SAP certification has already moved to exactly the same performance-based format. Assessment design varies by credential and transition timing.

Testing implications

Practise realistic end-to-end tasks, fault diagnosis, configuration choices and evidence-based explanation rather than relying only on question-bank recall.

Source register

What the evidence establishes

SAP Certification Marks 30 Years of Validating Skills for an Evolving World of Work

Public summary awaiting review. See the original source.

SAP News Center · official release

Publication review is recorded in the evidence and correction history. Images illustrate the article; they are not evidence.

History and corrections

Article body revision 1 · added 09 Oct 2026. Explanatory text added to the published evidence snapshot; evidence confidence, availability and source verification dates are unchanged.

Published revisions are retained. Update dates change only after a change to the content or evidence.

Revision 1 · published 21 Sept 2026 · updated 21 Sept 2026

Revision 2 · published 21 Sept 2026 · updated 30 Sept 2026

Correction: Evidence grade corrected from A to C on 30 September 2026. The cited sources support documented product claims but do not provide independent proof from live implementations. Wording was also reviewed for clarity. Source verification dates are unchanged. · 30 Sept 2026

Discussion

Comments are not currently available. To flag a factual issue, send a correction report.